Under current law, a purchaser of a new condominium unit has an absolute right to rescind their sales contract within 15 days after receiving the documents and information required to be provided to all new condominium purchasers.  The purchaser is not required to state any reasons for the rescission.  Section 11-126(b) contains the long list of materials that must be furnished to a new condominium purchaser, which are normally part of the Public Offering Statement for the condominium.  Under Section 11-126(d), the material provided cannot be amended “without the approval of the purchaser if the amendment would affect materially the rights of purchaser.  There is are exceptions for amendments required by a governmental authority or public utility, or “if the amendment is made as result of actions beyond the control of the vendor or in the ordinary course of affairs of the council of unit owners.”   In the event of an amendment, the purchaser has a right to rescind the contract with 5 days of receipt of the amendment.

Under the new law, purchaser maintain their right to rescind after receiving the required documents, and may still do so without stating a reason.  However, a purchaser seeking to rescind after an amendment of the documents must state reasons in writing showing that (1) that they have approval right; that is, that the amendment is not within one of the exceptions that do not require purchaser approval; and (2) that “the amendment affects materially and adversely the rights of the purchaser.

            Section 11-114 of the Maryland Condominium Act has long imposed a specific duty on a council of unit owners to maintain “[p]roperty insurance on the common elements and units, exclusive of improvements and betterments installed in the units by unit owners,” along with general liability insurance.  In response to this requirement, it was common practice for councils of unit owners to obtain insurance coverage for all elements of the condominium as originally constructed by the developer, including the units, with individual unit owners insuring improvements to the unit not provided by the developer, along with insuring personal property in the unit.

            Section 11-114 also provided that any deductable applicable under the property insurance policy was a common expense of the condominium, regardless of whether the cause of the damage originated in the common elements or an individual unit.  However, it authorized that the condominium’s bylaws could provide for a unit owner to be responsible for the deductible, if the cause of the damage originated in their unit, but only up to a maximum, initially of $1,000, and then increased to$5,000 by a 2008 amendment.

            Then along came the Court of Appeals decision in Anderson v. Council of Unit Owners of the Gables in Tuckerman Condominium, 404 Md. 560 (2008)..  The Court granted certiorari to consider two consolidated cases, one arising at The Gables on Tuckerman Condominium in Rockville, and the other at the Bridgeport Condominium in Laurel.  In the Rockville case, a leaking water heater within a unit had caused damage to the unit, without damage to any other unit or the common elements.  In the Laurel case, a kitchen grease fire caused the sprinkler system to activate, damaging the unit, but, again, causing no damage to other units or the structure.  In both cases, the unit owners sued the condominium council to recover the costs of repair.

            Interpreting Section 11-114, the Court of Appeals noted that Section 11-108.1 of the Condominium Act provides that, unless otherwise specified in the declaration or bylaws, “the council of unit owners is responsible for maintenance, repair, and replacement of the common elements, and each unit owner is responsible for maintenance, repair, and replacement of his unit.”  It ruled that the council’s insurance requirements under Section 11-114 applied “only to damage sustained to the common elements or the structure of the condominium.”  Specifically, it found that, while Section 11-114 provided that each unit owner was an insured person under the council’s policy, each owner is “insured under the master policy only as to his or her collective undivided interest in the entire condominium property,” and it is “not meant to insure each owner’s property or individual unit.”

            Accordingly, the Court held that the council of unit owners was not required to repair or replace property of an individual owner after any casualty loss. The significant impact of the decision was that it meant that Section 11-114 applied only to “damaged property owned by the owners collectively,” and the council was not responsible for insuring or repairing any portion of an individual unit, regardless of the origin of the cause of the property damage; that is, regardless of whether the cause originated in the common elements or the unit.  Damage to an individual unit would then become the sole responsibility of that unit owner in all circumstances, and they would be compelled to obtain their own insurance to protect against loss.

            This turned what had been customary practice on its head, and prompted the legislature to intervene.  The new law amends Section 108.1 to make it specifically subject to the provisions of Section 11-114.  It then amends Section 11-114 to make clear that the council of unit owners is required to maintain insurance “[f]or property and casualty losses to the common elements and the units, exclusive of improvements and betterments installed in the units by the unit owners other than the developer.” The new law also imposes the deductable requirement on any individual owner in whose unit the damage originates, regardless of whether the bylaws so provide, up to a maximum of $5,000.  Otherwise, the deductable remains a common expense.

            The result is that condominium master policies must cover property damage to all of the condominium structure, including both the common elements and units as originally constructed and finished by the developer, with the unit owners providing individual insurance for their improvements and personal contents.  If damage originates in the unit, the owner is responsible for the insurance deductible up to a maximum of $5,000.  The new law also requires that condominium annually notify each unit owner of the deductable responsibility and the amount of the deductable, and further requires that public offering statements notify potential buyers of the unit owner’s responsibility for the insurance deductable.

            It should be remembered, however, that, because the council is responsible for maintenance and condition of the common elements, where a common element defect, such as a water leak, is the source of damage to an individual unit and property, the council is responsible for the consequential damages to the unit and its contents.